My Year in Books

It’s become a tradition for me to do a year-end post about the books I read and reviewed. Goodreads helps a lot with that (though annoyingly, I couldn’t find a way to copy, share or use html code for the personalized graphic as I had in years past). Anyway, you can see my Year in Books arranged with pretty images and statistics here.

I read a total of 23 books, which is down one book from last year. That’s not too bad considering this year I spent a little more time on manuscript swaps with writing buddies. The genres fell into the following categories:

LGBTQ+ sci fi/fantasy: 13

LGBTQ+ general fiction: 4

LGBTQ+ mystery: 2

General sci fi/fantasy: 2

LGBTQ+ YA: 1

Non-fiction: 1

And I’m happy to say 95% of the LGBTQ+ titles were #OwnVoices. 🙂

Fourteen of those books I read for review sites, which explains the preponderance of LGBTQ+ and fantasy titles. I volunteer to review those genres. I have two favorites to recommend from that group.

The Gurka and the Lord of Tuesday by Saad Hossain is a laugh out loud, Pratchett-esque sci fi comedy drawn from Arabian folklore. You can read my review at NY Journal of Books here.

My other favorite title that I reviewed was This Town Sleeps by Dennis E. Staples. It’s a family saga/ghost story set in an Ojibwe community, with a gay lead character. This Town Sleeps was also the last book I finished in 2019. I received an advanced review copy. It doesn’t release until March 2020, and the review hasn’t gone up yet at Out in Print.

 

Some other honorable mentions: I did well with gay mysteries this year, and I highly recommend Marshall Thornton’s Late Fees and Michael Craft’s Choirmaster.

As for the nine titles I read entirely for leisure or research, Tom Cardamone’s short story collection Night Sweats: Tales of Homosexual Wonder and Woe tops the list. The stories are visceral, often disturbing and wildly imaginative. Tom and I did a Pop Up Swap on my blog, which you can read here.

I also really enjoyed J.P. Jackson’s Magic or Die, which I read for another author swap earlier in the year. That title is a gay mutant/superhero fantasy that draws on the author’s extensive knowledge of pagan beliefs and practices.

So what’s next for me? Nothing too different, I expect. Since I’m continuing as a reviewer at NY Journal of Books, Out in Print and Queer Sci Fi, I’ll be reading more sci fi/fantasy titles, especially those of LGBTQ+ interest. Plus I’m still working on expanding my Intro to Gay Fantasy reading list, hoping to discover some gems and classics. Sadly, I didn’t find any titles to add to the list this past year.

I’m also going to read more books written by authors of color.

This post also serves as my Happy Holidays post for 2019 so here’s a handsome fellow in the holiday spirit for you.

via GIPHY

I’m so grateful for your support and hope you have a rollicking or relaxing time, whichever floats your boat. Let me know how you did with books in 2019 and/or what you are looking forward to reading next year. 🙂

My Favorite Movies of 2013

Here are the top movies that inspired me creatively during the past year.

I have to say, 2013 was not a great year for me and sci fi/fantasy films. I saw Oz, The Great and Powerful, the film adaptations of Beautiful Creatures and Mortal Instruments, Oblivion, the new Superman: Man of Steel, and Pacific Rim. (I happily skipped mega-bigot Orson Scott Card’s Enders Game). I thought each of those movies was good, but none was especially memorable. I still want to see the Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters, Gravity, Thor: Dark World and the second Hobbit movie, so maybe there’s still time for another sci fi/fantasy film to get added to my annual list. As it is, I only have one.

Jack the Giant SlayerI really liked everything about Jack the Giant Slayer, from the re-told fairytale storyline, to the mood and the atmosphere, and to the acting and the action sequences. It got pretty crappy reviews and was branded as another lazy Hollywood fairytale remake, along with 2012’s Snow White and the Huntsmen, Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters and Red Riding Hood. But for me, Jack stood above those films simply for sticking to action adventure rather than overpowering the story with sexuality, modern sensibilities and/or “deeper meaning.” It’s not destined to be a classic, but I thought it was really fun and well-conceived.

The rest of my picks were contemporary dramas, comedies or a combination of the two.

Blue Jasmine

You can’t go wrong with a Woody Allen movie in my opinion.

It’s always tough for me to say what was my favorite film of the year, but if held above a flame, I’d give it to Blue Jasmine. I thought that the two lead characters, portrayed exceptionally well by Cate Blanchett and Sally Hawkins, had great stories to tell. That was interesting to see since so many of Allen’s films take things from a male character point-of-view. Blue Jasmine was wonderfully neurotic and complex, and I’m a sucker for that.

 

 

What Maisie Knew

Besides fantasy, dysfunctional family drama is probably my next favorite genre. Give me a fantasy with dysfunctional family drama and I’m chomping at the bit; erm, Game of Thrones perhaps?

This quiet film adaptation of Henry James’ novel What Maisie Knew is squarely contemporary, and I thought it was very impressive. Great writing, great acting, and heart-wrenching without pound-you-on-the-head sentimentality.

 

 

Kon Tiki

 

Based on the 1947 expedition of Swedish explorer Thor Heyerdahl to prove that ancient South Americans migrated, on rafts, to the Polynesian Islands, Kon Tiki is worth the ticket price just to see its cinematographic achievement. I literally swayed and lurched in my seat as the crew hung on throughout their perils on the open sea.

Beyond that, it’s an uplifting adventure story based on fresh subject matter.

 

 

The Hunt

Sliding further over to the dark side, this Danish film (a 2012 film but arriving in the U.S. for wide release in 2013) is about a father, displaced by an acrimonious divorce, who is falsely accused of sexual abuse when a troubled girl at the kindergarten where he works discloses fragmented feelings and memories. Loaded issues abound here, and what’s remarkable is the restrained portrayal of both the father and the young girl. Sympathy builds organically as the events unfold, and the only villains are some misguided vigilante fathers in the community who terrorize the main character. Even they get some redemption in the end, but the scars remain.

This Is The End

I have to include one guilty pleasure each year, and This Is The End got my guilty seal of approval for 2013. I watched the movie on a flight from New York City to Los Angeles, and granted: I had tossed back a vodka tonic or two. I laughed out loud so much, I’m sure it was majorly irritating to the nearby passengers.

That’s about all I should say about my feelings on this film in order to preserve a little integrity.

I feel bad that none of my picks so far have gay characters or themes. That’s not because I don’t support gay films. It’s just because none of the gay films I saw this year were 2013 releases. (I did see The Dallas Buyers Club, which has Jared Leto as a transgender/gay supporting character and deals with the early AIDS epidemic; I thought it was good but not great).

So I’ll give honorable mention to a couple of gay films I discovered this year.

I DoThis 2012 indie film had a grassroots tour across the country that went into 2013. I saw it On Demand in the spring. I thought the acting and the writing were solid, and the modern storyline was very appealing. Though I Do was marketed in part as a film about marriage equality and its implications for cross-national couples, I thought the movie’s handling of universal, tragic themes–the aftermath of the sudden death of the main character’s brother–was equally compelling.

Elliot Loves

Elliot Loves is a 2012 indie film that I watched On Demand this year. (My husband and I order in films a whole lot more than going to the movie theater these days). I thought the title character was an excellent portrait of an urban gay man growing up in the 90s/new millennium, on one hand experiencing greater freedom to express himself, but on the other still struggling for connection as he overcomes wounds of childhood, including and beyond homophobia.

My Favorite Books of 2013

It’s time for my annual lists, where I share my highly skewed reading and film-watching preferences. First up: books!

I read a total of twenty-four books this year, which is better than I did in 2012 (19 books).

I try to keep up with new releases in order to make this annual post somewhat relevant. I ended up doing better than previous years on that score as well. Half of the books I read this year were 2013 releases.

Here are the books I liked the best.

Helene Wecker's The Golem and the Djinni

This was my very favorite book of the year. An engrossing mix of folklore and period fiction, Wecker’s The Golem and the Djinni brings to life, in palpable detail, the experience of Jewish and Arab immigrants in late 19th century New York City. This book definitely has appeal for Neil Gaiman fans, and also for anyone looking for a story inspired by Middle Eastern folk legends.

 

 

 

David Zelman's Al Qaeda's Super Secret Weapon

Far on the other side of the spectrum, David Zelman’s comic send-up to military politics and homophobia was a highly enjoyable, transgressive read. Even better, it’s been banned by Apple iBooks for “objectionable content.” The story and the illustrations are definitely adult material, but its hardly “objectionable” for any adult reader with a sense of humor, in my opinion.

 

 

Andrew Killeen's The Khalifah's Mirror

 

As with The Golem and the Djinni above, I picked up this title while searching for books inspired by Middle Eastern folklore. I became a fast fan. This is the second book in “The Father of Locks” series, and it stands well on its own. Killeen has a madcap tone that goes off the rails for me at times, but the story’s unique mix of Arab-centered medieval history and gay/bisexual characters was a winning combination.

 

 

 

Mary Renault's The Persian Boy

 

The Persian Boy has been called the best work of ancient world historical fiction (gay-themed or otherwise). It only took me thirty years to finally read it when it came out in e-book format this past fall. It’s long and epic and filled with interesting details about the life of Alexander the Great. Most of all, it was the beautiful evocative writing that I loved..

Oz The Great and Powerful

standard_oz

Image courtesy of Disney.com

I went through several stages in anticipation of Disney’s “Oz The Great and Powerful.”

First, I felt resentful. If Hollywood was going to produce a big-budget epic on the subject of Oz, how could they overlook the material from Gregory Maguire’s Wicked series? No, I committed to myself. I was not going to shell out my money to support that unforgiveable betrayal.

Then, through a combination of my partner’s enthusiasm and the ubiquitous movie trailers, my curiosity was piqued. They came up with a compelling cast. I thought: could a movie really be bad with James Franco, Michelle Williams and Rachel Weisz? It looked like fun. And really, maybe the film world is big enough for more than one new story about the legend of Oz.

But next, I read the New York Times review. Wow. I haven’t read such a lambasting in quite awhile. I was back to the stage of writing off this new rendition of The Wizard of Oz as a highly likely disappointment. Here’s a little excerpt from film critic Manohla Dargis:

Can the major studios still make magic? From the looks of “Oz the Great and Powerful,” a dispiriting, infuriating jumble of big money, small ideas and ugly visuals, the answer seems to be no.

Ultimately, I decided to judge for myself. I went to see the movie with my honey-bunny and a friend just this afternoon.

The one sentence synopsis: “Oz The Great and Powerful” is about a charlatan magician Oz (James Franco) who learns how to change his shifty ways when he’s transported to a fantasy world, and he’s the one person who can serve up justice for a people terrorized  by a wicked witch.

So what can I say? The kids in the audience liked it (and there were plenty of them). But as a cross-over movie for adults, “Oz The Great and Powerful” fell flat for me. There wasn’t much to hold my interest in the story. Meanwhile, the one-dimensional characters and cutesy devices (a rescued porcelain doll) worked against that interest, in an eye-rolling and cringing way.

It’s unfortunate because I think kids’ films can work for adults, through delightful imagination (the Harry Potter series) and/or an interesting subtext (The Golden Compass). “Oz The Great and Powerful” has a little bit of the former, but mostly it felt to me like an unsuccessful mash-up of vintage and modern fantasy sensibilities. On the latter score, you could find a more intriguing subtext in a pre-school picture book. Good is good. Evil is evil. And according to Sam Raini’s Oz, only men have the psychological complexity to waffle a bit in between the two.

 

 

Best Movies of 2012

Here we go with my self-proclaimed Best Movies of 2012.

My typical disclaimer: I rarely, very rarely, recommend Hollywood blockbusters. It happens even more rarely the older I get. So as much as I love big epic fantasy as a genre, those titles tend to be underrepresented on my list. Instead, I usually go with quieter films – fantasy or not – with a strong narrative pull, real emotionality, and that highly subjective quality of resonance.

Another disclaimer: you may ask yourself, where are the queer films? Well, I didn’t see many of them, and I have no idea if that’s a reflection of the lower output (or quality) of queer cinema in 2012 or a random quirk of my movie-going behavior this year. I’ve included one film with a gay supporting character in my Honorable Mentions. Feel free to tell me what I should have seen.

What I do have is a list of great films featuring young adult characters.

I braced myself to see this ultra-heavy movie about an emotionally disturbed boy who grows up to do horrific things, and his embattled mother’s attempts to stop him. WNTTAK showcased the best acting of the year IMHO, with Tilda Swinton as the helpless, deeply-scarred mom, and Ezra Miller as the relentlessly destructive son. To boot, the story comes with an ending that leaves things quite reasonably unfinished yet with just a sliver of hope. My favorite film of the year.

Life of Pi was an unabashedly sentimental film. But give me an unabashedly sentimental film with an underdog hero I can get behind, like shipwrecked Suraj Sharma in the title role, and I’m a happy camper.

I thought the story was ridiculously imaginative and totally believable, due to Ang Lee’s direction and the tremendous special effects. It works whether you believe a boy survives on a life raft with a wild tiger, or the alternative version of the story revealed at the end.

I used the film’s French poster because I like it better.

Chronicle is one of the few 2012 fantasy movies I loved. Three teenage boys discover a mysterious object in the woods that gives them telekinetic abilities. Hand-held filming and capable, unknown actors give the movie an authentic feel – the antithesis to typical Hollywood superhero-storytelling. The movie left me thinking: this is what would really happen if a teenage boy unlocked supernatural abilities.

 

 

 

Honorable Mentions

I can’t fully recommend Snow White and the Huntsman because too many things bugged me about the storyline. It felt to me there was a missed opportunity to develop Charlize Theron’s Evil Queen further, taking her beyond the misogynistic bent of the source material. And the Huntsman seemed like a throwaway character, existing solely to create the possibility of a happy heterosexual ending for Snow White (who was played excellently by Kristin Stewart).

But the film had outstanding artistry and great world-building, along with lots of good intentions, just narrowly missing the mark for me.

Films about troubled suburban white kids have come a long way. I grew up on John Hughes’ movies in the 1980’s, and though I loved their comic moments of adolescent calamity (rendered most successfully in Sixteen Candles, I think), they always felt too safe and sanitized.

Nowadays, filmmakers can delve much deeper into the hardest problems facing teens. Perks of Being a Wallflower, based on Stephen Chbosky’s 1999 novel, does a commendable job in this regard. There’s a touch of familiarity to the film’s band of quirky, alienated characters, but they are beautifully brought to life by terrific casting (Ezra Miller shows once again that he is expertly suited as a teen anti-hero). What I liked the most about the film was the subtlety with which the main character Charlie’s (Logan Lerman) psychic wounds are revealed.

The narrow missing of the mark for me on this one was a heavy-handed ending. The film does such a good job of slowly unveiling complex issues – childhood sexual abuse, the loneliness of gay adolescence, dating violence – it felt unfair to wrap everything up neatly in the promise of enduring teen friendships.