Homophobia in Ancient World Historical Fiction

      2 Comments on Homophobia in Ancient World Historical Fiction

I was going to post my most favorite and least favorite movies of 2011 this week.  But I just finished reading Conn Iggulden’s GATES OF ROME, and it got me thinking, and pissed off.

What’s with all the homophobia in ancient world historical fiction and its close companion heroic fantasy?

Let me be clear about what I mean.  It’s not that having a homophobic character, or depicting a homophobic scenario, is always a bad thing.  It very well may be realistic for the character or the time period.

Contrary to romantic notions about ancient Greece or ancient Rome being a bastions of homosexual freedom, the status of homosexuals was more complex.  While society was free of the religious persecution of the Christian era, and the criminal persecution of later eras, there are records of condemning male effeminacy and sexual submissiveness in public speeches and theatre.  Sometimes they appear as light-hearted jabs questioning a man’s true manhood.  Sometimes they were more severe and scandalous.

To portray gay characters in ancient times, authors ought to take into account the nuance and paradox of the times.  It is reasonable to depict, for instance, the unique social pressures affecting a gay character, and his struggle to reconcile a masculine ideal with his sexual and emotional realities.

But, you can write about homophobia without contributing to it.

One dimension of homophobia—not limited to ancient world/heroic fantasy—is the exclusion of gay and lesbian characters.  Gay men and lesbians have existed forever, but how often are they portrayed in ancient world stories?  How often are they the hero of an epic journey?

When gay/lesbian characters do appear, too often they’re killed off as a device.  Homer may have been the first author to use the trope “bury your gays.”   Remember the death of Achilles’ lover Patroclus in THE ILIAD?

Gays also come to bitter ends in Conn Iggulden’s GATES OF ROME, Nick Drake’s NEFERTITI and Ursula Le Guin’s LAVINIA.

“Bury your gays” is really bad, but I find what’s worse is the stereotypical and negative treatment of gay characters.

In David Gemmel’s LORD OF THE SILVER BOW, the one lesbian character Andromache “grows out of” her lesbianism when she meets the hetero hero Helikaon.

In Nick Drake’s NEFERTITI, the one gay character Ay is a secretive, scheming puppetmaster.  The one lesbian character is a basket case who unknowingly and tragically abets the murder of her lover.

Conn Iggulden’s GATES OF ROME is an interesting study in homophobia. The one gay character is a dandified soldier, who is in love with the Consul and Military General Sulla.  Iggulden names the gay soldier Padacus – a conscious or unconscious play on ‘paidaika,’ a pejorative for gay in ancient Greece.  Sulla fears Padacus has become too emotionally attached, and will go into a jealous rage when he’s spurned in favor of a pair of female prostitutes.  Thus, Sulla decides his only option is to have Padacus killed.  Here we have the “gay basket case” trope and “bury you gays” all in one.

I’m not saying that every gay character should be likable and have a happy ending. But when there’s zero likability and zero happy endings, you have to wonder: why the bias from all these authors?

Even Ursula Le Guin, who has been credited with promoting good female portrayals in male-dominated fantasy/sci fi, manages to jump on the gay-hating bandwagon with her ancient Roman retold legend LAVINIA.  Her token gay character Prince Turnus is an insecure buffoon who is out to prove he isn’t gay, while everyone knows he is.  Of course he meets a violent death at the hands of Aeneas, the hetero hero of the story.

Maybe Le Guin felt her rendering of Turnus demonstrates a point about prevailing sexist and heterosexist attitudes.  But the portrayal would have worked better if there were other sympathetic gay characters in the story.   As it is, Turnus’ death comes off as a righteous fact-of-life.  He is only seen through the judgmental eyes of the heroine Lavinia, who is presented as a reliable and otherwise sympathetic storyteller.

Author/producer Perry Moore went on a crusade to change the superhero genre.  I’m feeling there’s a similar need with ancient world historical fiction.  “Ask yourself: Equal Rights?” was a slogan Moore used to insert in comics on post-it notes.  We need equal rights for gays in the ancient world.  We need more gay and lesbian heroes.

Best Books of 2011(ish)

      No Comments on Best Books of 2011(ish)

It’s that time of year when people proclaim the best books of 2011.  I’m not exactly a trusty resource for new releases, since I’m perennially catching up on my reading and researching historical fantasy primarily.

But I do have my opinions, and – not surprisingly – they don’t jibe with the New York Times recent 100 Notable Books of 2011.  (I haven’t read any of them, gulp).

I can also sadly report that my reading productivity plunged terribly this year.  In 2010, I read twenty-six books.  This year, with only about a month to go, I’ve read thirteen.  I blame my iPhone and Twitter, the biggest time-sucks while I’m commuting back and forth to work.

Of the thirteen books I’ve read this year, only two were new releases.  And one of those, Neil Gaiman’s AMERICAN GODS, was a ten-year anniversary re-publication.  Eek!

So, here goes what I got around to read that was fairly new, and that I highly recommend.

Annabel Lyon’s THE GOLDEN MEAN

It came out in 2009.  I picked it up in January 2011.  This is my all-time favorite ancient world historical.  It tells the story of Aristotle’s tutoring of young Alexander the Great, and it’s a fascinating portrayal of how the philosopher’s rational and ethical teachings may have influenced the greatest military general of all time.  For the intimidated:  THE GOLDEN MEAN is not all philosophical and heady stuff.  It deals with complex family relationships, the cruelty of childhood, and issues of mental disability and illness – all set within a vivid ancient world.

Neil Gaiman’s AMERICAN GODS

Soon to be an HBO mini-series, AMERICAN GODS is a funny, epic, engrossing adventure in which a down-on-his-luck ex-con gets caught up in a battle between old world gods and the idols of modern times (i.e. materialism, the media).  It’s filled with great retold parables with contemporary twists.

 

 

Gabrielle Burton’s IMPATIENT WITH DESIRE

Imagining the diary of Tamsen Donner, Burton illuminates the infamous story of 19th century American pioneering gone horribly wrong.  Tamsen comes to life as an early feminist faced with impossible choices.  This one is really, truly a 2011 release.

 

 

 

Now for a couple excellent books I read in 2011, just a few decades behind the times…

Shyam Selvadurai’s FUNNY BOY

FUNNY BOY (1997) is a semi-autobiographical story about growing up in Sri Lanka amidst the rising ethnic tensions – Sinhalese vs. Tamil — of the 1970’s and early 80’s.  A compelling gay coming-of-age story within a rich cultural setting.

 

 

 

Ursula LeGuin’s LEFT HAND OF DARKNESS (1969)

Setting aside some sexist and heterosexist undertones, forgiveable for the time of its publication, this book fascinated me.  The premise:  a male, human envoy visits a distant world where there is only one gender, that is essentially hermaphroditic.  The book has provocative things to say about sexuality, and politics.

Why Immortals Failed

      3 Comments on Why Immortals Failed

Sci fi blog i09 recently did an article:  “The 10 Most God-Awful Movies about Greek Mythology.”

Sadly, I have to say Immortals belongs on the list.  It’s definitely worse than #10 Percy Jackson & the Olympians, which I thought was good, harmless fun; and #1 Xanadu, which — c’mon now — never aspired to be more than cult-worthy camp.

I’d even give Clash of the Titans 2010 an edge over this year’s ancient Greek Hollywood tragedy.  At least CofT had a lot of great action sequences.

Immortals is loosely, woefully loosely, based on the story of Theseus, the demi-god founder of Athens, who famously slayed the Cretan Minotaur.  Nonsensical liberties with the source material was where the problems started for me.

Theseus is supposed to be the son of Poseidon, but in the movie he’s the son of Zeus.  His mother was the daughter of royalty, and the wife to a nobleman.  Immortals has his mother as an outcast peasant.  It seemed to me a dumb contrivance to cast Theseus as an underdog the audience *has to* get behind, and already I was annoyed.

Then, the movie muddles the story of the gods vs. the titans.  Here the gods — of whom there are curiously few — have defeated and banished the titans to imprisonment inside Mount Tartarus in a storyline that has more in common with Christian mythology (the exile of fallen angels) than anything ancient world-related.  The titans can be freed by a lost artifact called the Epirus bow (derivation unknown).  It’s a cool weapon, but what does it have to do with anything ancient Greek?

I won’t get bogged down in the other confusing details, because the greater transgression of the film is co-opting Greek mythology for a modern, Christian message.  Like the Clash of the Titans reboot, Zeus is basically the Christian Holy Father done up in Greek fantasy stylings.  It’s a story of good vs. evil, which has no place in the Greek belief system.  The gods were mercurial, ruthless at times, forgiving at others, most definitely to be feared, but flawed by jealousy and pride.  Their stories, their characters, were a reflection of human troubles.

When filmmakers portray that world with a Christian sensibility, they miss the point.  The stories of Theseus and other heroes weren’t about smiting evil and restoring humanity’s belief in a higher power.  They were about claiming glory in a ruthless world, and rarely were there happy endings.  Even after their amazing triumphs – Perseus fulfilling his destiny by slaying the gorgon Medusa or Jason returning with the Golden Fleece — the heroes are typically dogged by tragedy.  Perseus accidentally killed his grandfather, and went into a self-imposed exile.  Jason returned from his adventures to be killed by his wife.  The moral is that glory is fleeting.  There are no absolutes.  Good men come to bitter ends.  The gods keep us all in line.

On the plus side, I felt that Henry Cavill does a decent job as a low-key, reluctant hero, and his fighting sequences were fun to watch.  The costuming for the gods is delightfully over-the-top and sexy.  Mickey Rourke is a suitable dreadful villain (Hyperion) but his gravelly muttering bothered me in this instance.  Stephen Dorff is wasted as a disposable clichéd character – Theseus’ horny anti-establishment sidekick.  And the United Nations of Oracles — a quartet led by Slumdog Millionaire’s Freida Pinto — are just plain ridiculous.

I think a little more 300-style homoeroticism could’ve compensated for a general lack of inspiration.  But at least the men’s breastplates have nipples.

The Judy Gold Show

      No Comments on The Judy Gold Show

Got a chance to see Judy Gold’s Off-Broadway Show this weekend — the self-titled Judy Show — and it was absolutely hilarious.

The show hardly needs my humble little recommendation.  It’s been praised by the New York Times, New York Magazine, and Time Out New York.  It opened for a limited run over the summer and has been extended multiple times, most recently through November 27th.

Judy Gold fans will enjoy her stand-by Jewish mother schtick.  And the premise — “My life as a sitcom” — has plenty of nostalgic and ironic appeal for those of us Gen Xers who escaped through television during the discontents of a middle class, suburban dysfunctional upbringing.

As a journey through Judy’s childhood and young adulthood–a tall, awkward Jewish girl looking for love, acceptance and a break as a comedienne–it also has unexpectedly heartwarming moments.  A reflection on the early death of her father, who wanted to support Judy’s coming out, though she wasn’t ready to deal with it herself, is all poignancy and no schmaltz.

You can see the Jewishness was contagious.

The Judy Show is on an extended run at the DR2 Theatre at Union Square.  Discounted tickets are available here.

Yes Gay Penguins!

      No Comments on Yes Gay Penguins!

Few things make me happier than a story about gay penguins. But check out what’s going on at the Toronto Zoo.

Embedly Powered

So much for Canada’s more favorable laws for gay couples.

It’s actually pretty common for male penguins to pair up in captivity, and their natural habitat.  Besides Buddy and Pedro in Toronto, some celebrity couples include Roy and Silo from New York City’s Central Park Zoo, who inspired Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell’s children’s picture book AND TANGO MAKES THREE.  There was also Harry and Pepper from the San Francisco Zoo, Z and Vielpunkt from Bremerhaven Germany, and Cass and Wendell at New York City’s Aquarium.

Isn’t it time for Hallmark to start a line of Valentine’s Day cards featuring two male penguins, along with all the cutesy hetero bear and mouse and cat couples?